Farsight Remote Views Bashar (Darryl Anka as the channel) (1 Viewer)

[Laron]

As part of their Time-Cross project — which used to be something entirely different so it's strange using that label — Courtney Brown over at the Farsight remote viewing institute just announced, and relased, this new video over on YouTube. Within the hour and ten minutes, this project investigates an extraterrestrial named Bashar, who many know is channeled by Darryl Anka.

The conditions are blind, so the remote viewers are not aware of what or who, they are targeting. Brown reports that the remote viewers "go deep into Bashar's mind."

​

 

[theGalacticTravelChannel]

Super fun!, listen in now....

 

[Sinera]

The similarity between all three of them is again (like before) amazing. Definitely a recommended watch like all of Farsight's mystery (timecross) videos.

Nevertheless I remain highly skeptical of most of channelled material nowadays since we do not know 'where' of 'who' it comes from and if the information itself is accurate and not tainted by the channelled being's views and intentions. (I have seen Bashar vids before so I knew him and his material and presentation style before. I also read a Kryon book years ago, so I occupied myself a little with this field indeed in the past).

Moreover, I noticed that he seems to jump to conclusions when he says in his summary/analysis that it was definitely an ET. I don't see that and I watched the entire video closely.

There is sometimes some kind of bias in their/his post viewing analysis. No one of the viewers directly said that it was an ET (unlike other sessions where they even described or drew them on the board). They were talking about a being on another room/plane and mostly with feminine nurturing protective energy.

Princess' description of this being might hint at a typical ET appearance though, but she did not say it unless I missed it. Yes, Daryll Anka himself also says it is an ET being and even gives the background where its from etc., - but that would again be influencing (front-loading) the analysis and not the result of the session itself.

I mean, it could be ET of course and I see it also as highly likely. But could it also be a kind of 'nonphysical' (astral) being, a guide or an 'angel' (their surroundings are described as angelic), an aspect of his Higher Self, etc? Of course we can argue that any of these can also be perceived or seen as (an) 'ET' again.

What is also interesting is the pinned comment from Farsight (Courtney Brown) about the criticism of the process and the 'whispering' or 'prompting' at one point during the session. Here is the quote from the page (you can see it on top of the video's YT page as pinned):

Some people have mentioned that they hear someone in the room at 46:50 saying "this feminine energy here" before the viewer says those same words. It is true that this happens at this moment in the video, but it is not nefarious. All of our viewers do their work solo on paper before going to video. Our advanced viewers continue their sessions on video without anyone in the room. But our newer viewers are still learning how to do their work on video. We use our Time Cross projects as training platforms for our newer viewers. The newer viewers join the more experienced viewers and we seek to raise the presentational skills of the newer viewers in the process. In this instance, the viewer had already done a few takes of this part of her session, and she sometimes used some words on video that were not compatible with the paper sessions, and this needed to be corrected. There was no monitor in the room who was leading the session, but there was a production specialist in the room who was checking to see that the video conformed to the paper sessions in terms of low-level descriptions of the perceptions. More experience makes this unnecessary. But in this instance, the viewer is relatively new to using video with remote viewing, and still in training in terms of video presentations. The production quality of all of our videos is really quite high, and this is not accomplished by magic. It takes a LOT of training to get the viewers up to this level of presentational capability. For example, we are expecting to introduce a completely new viewer on video next month (June), and that viewer will have a production specialist in the room helping to assist in the elements of video presentation. There will be no leading of content. But the specialist will be telling the viewer how to stand, where to look, etc., as well as making sure that the video presentation conforms to the sessions on paper. Again, this is not leading. But it is a professionalizing process in terms of video production. In the current video, PrinCess makes the first presentation. She is very experienced with video production involving remote viewing. When her session was recorded, there was absolutely no person in the room, and she had to text us using her cell phone when it was "safe" for us to re-enter the recording environment. That is the goal for all viewers. But again, PrinCess has been doing this for years, and her level of professionalism in video presentation is superb. We aim for all of our viewers to be able to do this. Again, this is not leading with the newer viewers, but it is checking all the production elements to make sure everything is done correctly. And again, the paper sessions are done solo, so we must ensure that the content of the video sessions closely matches the content of the paper sessions while simultaneously training our viewers to make their video presentations as engaging as they are accurate.

I'd like to believe him but I understand the criticism or even 'disappointment' it produced among some commenters.

 

[Anaeika]

I noticed the same thing, Sinera.

This also goes into how we define an ET too. “It” is definitely extraterrestrial as in not of this Earth and not physical by nature.

 

[Sinera]

This also goes into how we define an ET too. “It” is definitely extraterrestrial as in not of this Earth and not physical by nature.

True. Two of them also said in the video literally it is 'not human'. But so is the Higher Self, an astral being, a guide, an Angel, astral 'wildlife' (as Robert Bruce calls 'elementals'), etc. All of these 'entities' could channel stuff telepathically.

However, if we apply the broader definition you and I just gave here then it is also 'ET'.

 

[Anaeika]

It is a broad definition, yes. Bashar seems out of et dimension into something otherwordly and angelic, perhaps angelic from our earthly point of view. Really “it” is nonphysical consciousness.

But then if he/she is not an alien, how do you explain the triangular-shaped ufo that Anka saw preceeding his ability to channel? That was his personal impetus to explore this area, whereas he was not open to such ideas beforehand. It was a trigger point to fulfill his blueprint and channel if his free will choice continues to be yes. I doubt anyone else saw this ufo; it was meant just for Anka.

 

[Sinera]

But then if he/she is not an alien, how do you explain the triangular-shaped ufo that Anka saw preceeding his ability to channel? That was his personal impetus to explore this area, whereas he was not open to such ideas beforehand. It was a trigger point to fulfill his blueprint and channel if his free will choice continues to be yes. I doubt anyone else saw this ufo; it was meant just for Anka.

My point was about the mistake by Farsight of frontloading this kind of information in the session analysis.

I was only referring to the session which should not include any previous information from the target to keep the results and the analysis based on it really 'clean' and scientific in a way. You need a blank sheet for remote viewing and avoid pre-conceptions, biases and information that serve as 'frontloaders'.

Yes, as said by myself also, Anka says himself it is an ET and that this ET also uses a craft. So it is likely indeed.

 

[Anaeika]

Sinera, you’re BRILLIANT!

 

[Sinera]

@Sinera, you’re BRILLIANT!

I know.