U.S. military assets used to attack Pentagon on 9/11: Video proof (1 Viewer)

[Pod]

Jeez! It is all coming out now isn't it. Deep state just got re-named "deep shit state"

RAJA99 : Situs Hacksaw Gaming Demo Link Alternatif Login Terbaik

Raja99 situs terbaik menghadirkan game online terbaru saat ini Hacksaw Gaming dengan fitur demo mainkan tanpa deposit menggunakan link alternatif login Raja 99

www.intellihub.com

 

[Sinera]

It is all coming out now isn't it.

Not 'now'. I have already seen this video (the first one) years ago in many truther vids examining 9-11. The YT video with this footage is from 2010 already (click on the video to go to the YT page and you see the date).

Nothing against the info which is valuable, but it is wrongly praised as 'new(s)' by that source. Seems click-bait to me since it is not news.

Actually it is even frustrating if we think about it since it has been so long out (almost 10 years) and despite the convincing proof that it is a missile ... nothing happened. No one (of the general public, let alone the MSM) cares.

So no. In this sense it is not 'coming out' now. Unfortunately.

 

[Pod]

Thanks for that clarification Sinera. Maybe this time round it will be seen by those who missed it ten years ago. Like me!

 

[Sinera]

Thanks for that clarification Sinera. Maybe this time round it will be seen by those who missed it ten years ago. Like me!

Yes, of course, nothing against the publication itself. It has to be spread wide. So it is a good thing if it is repeated over and over again. I wish more alternative news or blog outlets would cover it (repeatedly) until it takes hold even among the dumbed down masses of people. Never give up hope.

 

[Linda]

There still are people who don't know about Building 7 - not to mention the newscaster talking about the destruction before it actually imploded.

 

[Snowmelt]

There still are people who don't know about Building 7 - not to mention the newscaster talking about the destruction before it actually imploded.

It seems incredible - but I know you're right about that, Linda. What I think is, people unconsciously protect themselves from anything new which might rattle their cage, their whole worldview. If they even saw and recognised something too jarring, they just couldn't handle the consequence of having to give up their old platform, their old rant, their old, tried, and trusted self-maintenance programming. It's the only explanation I can come up with. If a pixel in the hologram is out of place, for them it just isn't there.

 

[Pod]

It seems incredible - but I know you're right about that, Linda.

Spot on Linda and Melt. I think a lot of it has to do with not wanting to feel the rage, the pain of being lied to and betrayed.

"What building 7?"

 

[Bert]

Spot on Linda and Melt. I think a lot of it has to do with not wanting to feel the rage, the pain of being lied to and betrayed.

"What building 7?"

Building 7 was one of the smaller buildings that was only damaged very little by the collapse of the towers.
officially it collapsed on it's own but:
- The mayor said it was "pulled"
- a dutch demolition expert said it was controlled demolition and wanted to congratulate the person before he knew it was building 7
- all the court files against ENRON were on servers in that building. After 911 no one talked about enron anymore and there was no more proof.
- there are movies from the hudson river that let you hear the explosions before the buildings start to collapse.

 

[Sinera]

"What building 7?"

Ok, you were joking, right?

But yes, if I tell people that 3 towers fell on that day I still get strange looks from many. It was still a high-rise tower like we have in every major city. They only think of the two iconic WTC ones where the two planes officially crashed into.

I've heard another story about the Pentagon which is even more fishy. Not a long time before some engineers fortified one wall, but only one. It was exactly the one where the missile ... oh sorry, I mean the 'plane' hit. It is said they were lucky that it did not hit any of the other walls of that building because then the damage to the Pentagon would have been much higher and maybe it would all have been dust and rubble instead of only that little 'hole'.
Also it was said that no normally undestructible plane remnants were found on the lawn or in the crash site but should have been. Need to check the steel wall story, however, maybe it is not true.

Here is CNN footage from that day where they say 'no plane' .....



Btw, did a google search and it is so shameful how the 'official narrative' and some 'debunking' websites are pushed now. There is almost no 'conspiracy' site coming up anymore. Used to be different years ago. The giant tech firms help erase and falsify history. Almost the same now with google-owned YouTube. We live in Orwellian times indeed.

 

[Pod]

Excellent post Bert. I am aware of building 7 and my comment was somewhat tongue in cheek. But you are absolutely right to clarify the circumstances around 7 and it's collapse. You have added needed information to this thread. There are people who do NOT know about it even now.

Several years ago in Thailand, I was helping to home school a young boy who was living with me for a while. I recall going through the constitution with him one day (he was American) and I wondered if I should tell him the truth about 9/11 or go with the official narrative. I felt very strongly that I should tell him the truth (or the truth as we suspected then) and give him youtube links for his homework.

Eventually, I steeled myself and said something like "There are things about 9/11 that I want to discuss with you" "Oh you mean that it was an inside job?" he replied. It was clear he knew exactly what the score was. How old was he? Eleven, maybe twelve. He was so clued up!

 

[Pod]

The giant tech firms help erase and falsify history.

Too late Sinera, they already know. I just tried with duckduckgo. Plenty coming up there.

 

[Sinera]

"Oh you mean that it was an inside job?" he replied. It was clear he knew exactly what the score was. How old was he? Eleven, maybe twelve. He was so clued up!

Great kid!

 

[Linda]

This afternoon I was showing my tree slab and talking about the rings showing each year of growth. This tree had been around in the 100-200 year range. One of the adults said something about the moon landing, and a high-school kid said - do you mean the one that was faked. I just let the conversation roll on, but was heartened.

I don't want to go off on the moon tangent, but thought you all would be happy to hear a 16-yr-old speak up about a conspiracy.

 

[Sinera]

It was posted in a thread here before but I think it fits in here well. Amazing work by the two most experienced RVers from Farsight. It has all been blind to the target. Of course they might have known very early in the process what they were remote viewing then.

 

[Alain]

I didn t knew of the pentagon and number 7 at the moment it arrived but number 7 is a new ingormation for me now

 

[Linda]

I didn t knew of the pentagon and number 7 at the moment it arrived but number 7 is a new ingormation for me now

These two instances are ones that most call into question the "official story" because the visual evidence just is not there. It almost as though a veil was cast over them so people would not think about them.

 

[Bert]

Here is some more info with proof there were NO planes in 911 in the main towers, only CGI:
https://911planeshoax.com/tag/911-no-planes/